Inspired by
the National Journals race rankings, I am going to take an early stab at the 2008 Presidential field.
The RepublicansThe right side of the field breaks down like this. You have the moderates, like McCain and Rice. The intelligent conservatives, like Romney and Gingrich. (Oh man, I know I am going to hear it from the left on Gingrich!) The professional politicians, like Frist and Allen. And the cultural wingnuts, like Santorum and Brownback.
I'm torn about who I want the Republicans to nominate. I love my country, so I sort of want them to nominate someone from the first two categories. But I also love politics, so I sort of want them to nominate someone I'll be happy about mashing into a fine pulp.
The DemocratsI like Senators John Edwards and Russ Feingold. And I have high hopes for Mark Warner.
Hillary would be a great President. But I have this pet theory about voters and careerism. I think a lot of people voted against Kerry because they were turned off by his sheer ambition. The guy lived his whole life like he wanted to be President. War hero. Prosecutor. Senator. People don't like relentless achievers. They're more comfortable with the guy who ambled into history.
If you grant me this (wacky) theory for two seconds, you'll see the biggest problem Hillary really has. It's not the liberalism. It's the political calculation. The fundraising. The move to New York. The staying-with-the-cheating-husband thing. Biden has the same problem. So does Bayh. Their resumes are almost too good to be trusted.
It's early.I'm not saying Tom Vilsack couldn't get me out waving signs on street corners. I'm just saying that I can't see myself getting fired up over a Biden vs. McCain race. But if it's Edwards vs. Brownback, I'm quitting my job and working full-time to save my country.